清空播放记录
剧照
更新时间：2024-04-11 15:43
详细剧情
19世纪的爱尔兰，英俊健硕的佃户青年约瑟·多尼利（汤姆·克鲁斯 Tom Cruise 饰）遭遇丧父之痛。为给父亲报仇，这个莽撞的青年决心杀死地主丹尼尔·克里斯迪（Robert Prosky 饰）。阴差阳错让他功败垂成，不过却因此邂逅了地主美丽的女儿夏莲（妮可·基德曼 Nicole Kidman 饰）。与保守的父母不同，个性张扬却又娇贵单纯的夏莲一心离开故土，到外面闯荡天地。 偶然机缘，夏莲和约瑟结伴而逃，登上了开往美国的轮船。但是他们的旅途从一开始便充满了不幸，夏莲的家当被人或骗或抢，口袋空空。两人暂住波士顿大亨凯利管辖的破旧公寓里，娇傲的夏莲放下身段进工厂打工，而健壮的约瑟则靠打拳赚取营生。在此过程中，他们经历了人生的大起大落，彼此的心间也渐渐埋下爱情的种子……
长篇影评
1 ) 由此片想到了四年之后的《泰坦尼克号》
两个怀揣梦想分属不同社会阶层的年轻人--一个是娇生惯养富家千金（妮可基德曼）和一个是出身卑微却立志出人头地的金童（汤姆克鲁斯），为追求梦想远渡重洋的情节让我依稀想到了4年之后上映席卷全球票房的《泰坦尼克号》。从情节来看，前者的故事更加丰富，人物命运更加曲折，历史背景也更加深刻，但显然投资、制作、宣传上的劣势注定了它不可能像后者那么成功。
2 ) 对白
也许是专业的特点吧，看到比较好的句子总会习惯性的摘入下来。下面是剧中临近尾声时候男女主角互诉衷肠的一段对白。
Joseph：The world means nothing to me without you. I tried to prove myself to you, I know nothing of the books, all I know is Joseph loves Shannon, that is all that matters to me.
Shannon：This is our dream together. I don't want this without you. I loved you. I loved you from the first time I saw you.
Joseph：I often wondered if you love me.
Shannon：How? You died? You died?
Joseph：I can assure you, I won't die twice.
并不是很准确，有些地方实在是太含糊了，反复听了几遍还是没有听明白，凑合吧~
Joseph：The world means nothing to me without you. I tried to prove myself to you, I know nothing of the books, all I know is Joseph loves Shannon, that is all that matters to me.
Shannon：This is our dream together. I don't want this without you. I loved you. I loved you from the first time I saw you.
Joseph：I often wondered if you love me.
Shannon：How? You died? You died?
Joseph：I can assure you, I won't die twice.
并不是很准确，有些地方实在是太含糊了，反复听了几遍还是没有听明白，凑合吧~
3 ) Dreams Are Not Far and Away
America, an attractive land to those dreamers, a place of flowing milk and honey, a field full of opportunities and challenges.
Ireland, where potatoes being the nation’s staple food crop, a place of thriving landlords and surviving peasants, an island only an ocean’s distance away from America.
The story of the two Irish dream-catchers linked them together.
Far and Away, the title of the movie, is also the distance between dreams and reality. The detachability of the dreams offers the story’s possibility and credibility.
Joseph and Charlene, two Irish young people. One was the son of a poor tenant who could not afford the tenancy and had his house burnt as a result and died away fortuneless; the other was the daughter of a rich landlord who gained a lot of wealth through years’ accumulation. The tenant happened to be paying for the landlord’s field, so Joseph met Charlene when he entered her father’s mansion to take his revenge for his father’s death. He failed, having more time to stay with the noble maid.
Two hearts were both pursuing for freedom and independence. Joseph always bore in mind his father’s last words: A man is worthless and soulless until he has had his own land. He was tolerant of miseries but reluctant to leave his home for a new life. Charlene was well-educated and open-minded and eager to seek for a new life in the New World but unready to face obstacles and setbacks. Once they united accidentally and set for America, their dreams seemed approachable.
However, when they reached America, dreams fell to the ground, and the cruel society forced them to make a living by doing odd jobs. This was the real image of American dreams started from the bottom.
If we refer to the history books, we will find that Irish Americans were frequently discriminated against in housing, jobs, and education. Anti-immigrant groups stereotyped the Irish as “uncivilized”, “unskilled” and “impoverished”. Irish Americans usually lived in crowded ethnic ghettos and worked in the least desirable occupations. Irish American men were usually manual laborers, while Irish American women often found employment as domestic servants. This picture perfectly matches that of Joseph and Charlene.
The liberty and democracy Uncle Sam preached was nothing but a piece of blank paper.
Joseph worked his way up as a successful boxer; thus he could save money to buy a carriage to go to Oklahoma for the realization of his dream—to own a land. Charlene could only work as a chicken-dresser, suffering all that she had not suffered at home. But dreams were fragile. A loss on the boxing-ring sent him out of the asylum. They were both homeless and penniless.
Let’s come back to the Declaration of Independence which reflects American beliefs, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Under such beliefs, the American character was formed, which distinguished it from that of any other nation: 1) Individual Freedom and Self-Reliance; 2) Equality of Opportunity and Competition; 3) Material Wealth and Hard Work; 4) Goodness of Humanity and Improvement; 5) Time and Efficiency; 6) Assertiveness. That’s the point. 1) is their ideal, 2) is their way, 3) is their purpose, 4) is their pursuit, 5) is their principle, 6) is their habit. These Irish people had their own virtues inside and they were shaping themselves to correspond with the American winning rule. The jungle law tells us: the fittest survives.
They departed after that incident. Joseph worked on the railway and Charlene came back to his family who had been to America. But they could not let go of their dreams. Anyone could have dreams, whether he be a king or a beggar. When God gives us life, he gives us mind, too; with mind, we could dream.
Therefore, fate arranged their reunion in Oklahoma. They took part in the race to get their own land. This was not only Joseph’s father’s dream, and yet not only Irish Americans’ dream; it was a dream generally possessed by the ordinary people, described as the “American Dream”. To be or not to be? The answer lay in their own hands. They grabbed the bridle tightly and penetrated the banner which symbolized the achievement of their dreams into their land. They became heroes at that very moment.
Happiness was gained through inconceivable efforts. The easily gotten gold was never considered satisfactory. Joseph and Charlene played their parts in this contest concerning dreams, which gave a vivid illustration of the American character and the so-called “American Dream”—from nobody to somebody. Once you try, you will find dreams are not far and away unless you are sloth and aimless. The greatest distance is not between two person’s hearts but one’s two fingers.
I do, therefore I am.
Giant Woo
2005-5-23
Ireland, where potatoes being the nation’s staple food crop, a place of thriving landlords and surviving peasants, an island only an ocean’s distance away from America.
The story of the two Irish dream-catchers linked them together.
Far and Away, the title of the movie, is also the distance between dreams and reality. The detachability of the dreams offers the story’s possibility and credibility.
Joseph and Charlene, two Irish young people. One was the son of a poor tenant who could not afford the tenancy and had his house burnt as a result and died away fortuneless; the other was the daughter of a rich landlord who gained a lot of wealth through years’ accumulation. The tenant happened to be paying for the landlord’s field, so Joseph met Charlene when he entered her father’s mansion to take his revenge for his father’s death. He failed, having more time to stay with the noble maid.
Two hearts were both pursuing for freedom and independence. Joseph always bore in mind his father’s last words: A man is worthless and soulless until he has had his own land. He was tolerant of miseries but reluctant to leave his home for a new life. Charlene was well-educated and open-minded and eager to seek for a new life in the New World but unready to face obstacles and setbacks. Once they united accidentally and set for America, their dreams seemed approachable.
However, when they reached America, dreams fell to the ground, and the cruel society forced them to make a living by doing odd jobs. This was the real image of American dreams started from the bottom.
If we refer to the history books, we will find that Irish Americans were frequently discriminated against in housing, jobs, and education. Anti-immigrant groups stereotyped the Irish as “uncivilized”, “unskilled” and “impoverished”. Irish Americans usually lived in crowded ethnic ghettos and worked in the least desirable occupations. Irish American men were usually manual laborers, while Irish American women often found employment as domestic servants. This picture perfectly matches that of Joseph and Charlene.
The liberty and democracy Uncle Sam preached was nothing but a piece of blank paper.
Joseph worked his way up as a successful boxer; thus he could save money to buy a carriage to go to Oklahoma for the realization of his dream—to own a land. Charlene could only work as a chicken-dresser, suffering all that she had not suffered at home. But dreams were fragile. A loss on the boxing-ring sent him out of the asylum. They were both homeless and penniless.
Let’s come back to the Declaration of Independence which reflects American beliefs, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Under such beliefs, the American character was formed, which distinguished it from that of any other nation: 1) Individual Freedom and Self-Reliance; 2) Equality of Opportunity and Competition; 3) Material Wealth and Hard Work; 4) Goodness of Humanity and Improvement; 5) Time and Efficiency; 6) Assertiveness. That’s the point. 1) is their ideal, 2) is their way, 3) is their purpose, 4) is their pursuit, 5) is their principle, 6) is their habit. These Irish people had their own virtues inside and they were shaping themselves to correspond with the American winning rule. The jungle law tells us: the fittest survives.
They departed after that incident. Joseph worked on the railway and Charlene came back to his family who had been to America. But they could not let go of their dreams. Anyone could have dreams, whether he be a king or a beggar. When God gives us life, he gives us mind, too; with mind, we could dream.
Therefore, fate arranged their reunion in Oklahoma. They took part in the race to get their own land. This was not only Joseph’s father’s dream, and yet not only Irish Americans’ dream; it was a dream generally possessed by the ordinary people, described as the “American Dream”. To be or not to be? The answer lay in their own hands. They grabbed the bridle tightly and penetrated the banner which symbolized the achievement of their dreams into their land. They became heroes at that very moment.
Happiness was gained through inconceivable efforts. The easily gotten gold was never considered satisfactory. Joseph and Charlene played their parts in this contest concerning dreams, which gave a vivid illustration of the American character and the so-called “American Dream”—from nobody to somebody. Once you try, you will find dreams are not far and away unless you are sloth and aimless. The greatest distance is not between two person’s hearts but one’s two fingers.
I do, therefore I am.
Giant Woo
2005-5-23
4 ) Far and Away
美国梦和风险投资－－在那个美国梦的年代，只有最勇敢最有谋略运气最好的人才能梦想成真。怎么那么像风投啊！－－大拇指定律，大多数的风险投资事件中，每十个风险资本所投入的创业公司中，平均会有三个企业垮台； 三个企业会成长为一两千万美元的小公司并停滞在那里，最终被收购或被清算；另外三个企业会上市并会有不错的市值；其中的一个则会成为耀眼的企业新星，并被称作“大拇指”－－每十个去美国的人，有3个死在飘洋过海的路上，3个沦为奴隶，3个成为中产阶级，其中一个获得显赫的地位和殷实的家产。哈哈哈，我想太多了。
关于爱情－－1.Tom Cruise剔除身高因素真的是灰常灰常帅滴！Nicole Kidman还是年轻的时候更漂亮些！我们假设下如果男主人公长的很衰，女主人公又肥又丑会怎么样？同样的假设应用于《泰坦尼克号》或者《Meet Joe Black》等巨经典的大片上看看是否还会有如此的荡气回肠，“内在美比外在美更重要”在爱情理论－－至少是好莱坞爱情里是不成立的。2.女人，只要你长的好就一定能吸引人。前提是长得好－－如果你愚蠢肤浅，则是天真可爱的甜美公主；如果说话刻薄，则是自信耀眼的冰美人；如果你穿着妖艳，则是光彩照人；如果穿的破烂，则是破旧的衣服也掩盖不了你的光芒；如果你生性聒噪，则是活泼动感美女；如果你少言寡语，则是娴静如花。。。如果很可惜你属于着陆时头朝地的天使，就没有那么幸运了，前面那短排比的论证您则只能去每个分句的前半句。3.如果有那样一个fight for you and his dream的男人，你无法不被一个为你流汗流血拼命的男人吸引，尽管这是一种最原始的吸引。。。甭管怎么说，一个坚持自己的梦想不懈努力的男人，一个愿意为心爱的女人斗争的汉子，外加还那么帅那么性感，那个女生不被吸引哦－－如果不被吸引可能是因为有什么偏见或者取向问题吧（最近数学听多了嘛，怎么说话越来越严密了）。
经典台词再现：
Joseph：The world means nothing to me without you. I tried to prove myself to you, I know nothing of the books, all I know is Joseph loves Shannon, that is all that matters to me.
Shannon：This is our dream together. I don't want this without you. I loved you. I loved you from the first time I saw you.
为什么要再现下呢，因为这觉得是useful express:影片的最后这样的真情告白让死人都能复活哦，你说是不是很无敌。
关于爱情－－1.Tom Cruise剔除身高因素真的是灰常灰常帅滴！Nicole Kidman还是年轻的时候更漂亮些！我们假设下如果男主人公长的很衰，女主人公又肥又丑会怎么样？同样的假设应用于《泰坦尼克号》或者《Meet Joe Black》等巨经典的大片上看看是否还会有如此的荡气回肠，“内在美比外在美更重要”在爱情理论－－至少是好莱坞爱情里是不成立的。2.女人，只要你长的好就一定能吸引人。前提是长得好－－如果你愚蠢肤浅，则是天真可爱的甜美公主；如果说话刻薄，则是自信耀眼的冰美人；如果你穿着妖艳，则是光彩照人；如果穿的破烂，则是破旧的衣服也掩盖不了你的光芒；如果你生性聒噪，则是活泼动感美女；如果你少言寡语，则是娴静如花。。。如果很可惜你属于着陆时头朝地的天使，就没有那么幸运了，前面那短排比的论证您则只能去每个分句的前半句。3.如果有那样一个fight for you and his dream的男人，你无法不被一个为你流汗流血拼命的男人吸引，尽管这是一种最原始的吸引。。。甭管怎么说，一个坚持自己的梦想不懈努力的男人，一个愿意为心爱的女人斗争的汉子，外加还那么帅那么性感，那个女生不被吸引哦－－如果不被吸引可能是因为有什么偏见或者取向问题吧（最近数学听多了嘛，怎么说话越来越严密了）。
经典台词再现：
Joseph：The world means nothing to me without you. I tried to prove myself to you, I know nothing of the books, all I know is Joseph loves Shannon, that is all that matters to me.
Shannon：This is our dream together. I don't want this without you. I loved you. I loved you from the first time I saw you.
为什么要再现下呢，因为这觉得是useful express:影片的最后这样的真情告白让死人都能复活哦，你说是不是很无敌。
5 ) 俄克拉荷马草原的风吹拂着的爱情
我一直觉得，这是我看过最好的爱情电影了。
我喜欢里面，在俄克拉荷马州广袤的草原上，万马奔腾争夺土地的场面。
我喜欢那很大的土腥味的风，吹着刚洗好的白窗帘白床单呼啦啦地响，两个人隔着晾衣绳，隔着吹到脸上的白窗帘，见面，互相致意：
“那么，我们就算结束了？”
“应该算吧……”
我喜欢那女孩伏在男孩身上大哭：
“我爱你，我一直都爱你，从第一次见面就爱你，你不能死。”
镜头拉远，拉远，直到她哭泣的身影和她身影之下的他，都变成浓郁草色之间的小小黑点。
天地如此之大，他们的梦想如此之小，他们的爱如此悲怆。
忽然男孩睁开眼睛说：“我就知道……”
我最喜欢的，是那女孩的生机勃勃。
第一次见面，她用干草叉刺伤男孩大腿，然后丢下叉子声嘶力竭地大喊“非礼！！！”
她母亲用瓦盆盖住男孩大腿根部的关键部位，给他包扎伤口，等母亲一走开，她就冲上去移开瓦盆看。
她用梯子半夜爬上男孩的窗口，崆峒一声跌进去，挥着手里的报纸：“美国有土地，你去不去？”
她问男孩：“我好看吗？”
男孩顿一顿，说：“你是我见过的最好看的女孩。”
她听完就满意地砰的翻个身睡去，全不顾背后人家欲火焚身。
那是年轻时代的汤姆·克鲁斯和妮可·基德曼，那时他们相爱着。
他们俩的爱是看得到的，戏里戏外，如此生机勃勃，就像俄克拉荷马大草原的风。
那时候的妮可·基德曼，眼神不像现在这样凌厉，而是生动乖巧如同小鹿。
那时候的汤姆·克鲁斯，一脸农民本色的憨厚，不似现在携妻带女作上流社会状。
他们就像电影中这从爱尔兰奔赴美国梦的一对，年轻、有活力、有梦想。
我一直觉得，这是我看过最好的爱情电影。
http://gallimard.blogcn.com/index.shtml
我喜欢里面，在俄克拉荷马州广袤的草原上，万马奔腾争夺土地的场面。
我喜欢那很大的土腥味的风，吹着刚洗好的白窗帘白床单呼啦啦地响，两个人隔着晾衣绳，隔着吹到脸上的白窗帘，见面，互相致意：
“那么，我们就算结束了？”
“应该算吧……”
我喜欢那女孩伏在男孩身上大哭：
“我爱你，我一直都爱你，从第一次见面就爱你，你不能死。”
镜头拉远，拉远，直到她哭泣的身影和她身影之下的他，都变成浓郁草色之间的小小黑点。
天地如此之大，他们的梦想如此之小，他们的爱如此悲怆。
忽然男孩睁开眼睛说：“我就知道……”
我最喜欢的，是那女孩的生机勃勃。
第一次见面，她用干草叉刺伤男孩大腿，然后丢下叉子声嘶力竭地大喊“非礼！！！”
她母亲用瓦盆盖住男孩大腿根部的关键部位，给他包扎伤口，等母亲一走开，她就冲上去移开瓦盆看。
她用梯子半夜爬上男孩的窗口，崆峒一声跌进去，挥着手里的报纸：“美国有土地，你去不去？”
她问男孩：“我好看吗？”
男孩顿一顿，说：“你是我见过的最好看的女孩。”
她听完就满意地砰的翻个身睡去，全不顾背后人家欲火焚身。
那是年轻时代的汤姆·克鲁斯和妮可·基德曼，那时他们相爱着。
他们俩的爱是看得到的，戏里戏外，如此生机勃勃，就像俄克拉荷马大草原的风。
那时候的妮可·基德曼，眼神不像现在这样凌厉，而是生动乖巧如同小鹿。
那时候的汤姆·克鲁斯，一脸农民本色的憨厚，不似现在携妻带女作上流社会状。
他们就像电影中这从爱尔兰奔赴美国梦的一对，年轻、有活力、有梦想。
我一直觉得，这是我看过最好的爱情电影。
http://gallimard.blogcn.com/index.shtml
6 ) 那条遥远的地平线——怀念《大地雄心》的金童玉女
【完成于2008年底。原址：http://commu.dangdang.com/member/myreviewdetail.php?displayid=4787179783862&review_id=1710101】
日前，电影频道忽然播出了《大地雄心》，转台晚了，只看到一个结尾，却是最激动人心的部分。重温着最年轻英俊的农民约瑟夫，重温着最狂野执著的淑女莎朗……那是十六年前的汤哥和妮姐，那是他们延续金童玉女神话的时刻，那是相爱的季节，饱含相思的脉脉
如今琵琶别抱蝉过别枝，梧桐落籽水仙结实，再看当年影片，伤感和遗憾怎能不使人念及春江月夜桥边红药，对影徘徊孤独寂寥？
原是我最爱的靓汤冷妮夫妻档电影，《大开眼戒》根本不及它边角。当年电影上映恶评如潮，我却独爱约瑟夫的鲁莽率性和莎朗的发鬈飘摇
终究是劳燕分飞了。他没有壮志凌云，只是专心育女；她站在奥斯卡和香奈儿的红地毯顶端，却莞尔一笑暗洒泪滴。两人可还记得，曾在同一部电影中青涩配戏、驰骋大地？
Far And Away——《大地雄心》译名粗犷，《遥远的地平线》译名细腻，如今看来总是悲凄。甚至连主人公的名字也有玄机：农民约瑟夫搏到了土地赢得了娇妻，而国王约瑟夫最终却失去了茜茜。可恼他们夫妻，在相亲相爱了十年后，决绝仳离
他们肯定忘却了那个画面：在一望无际的土地上，他远远地凝视着她穿梭的背影，感到自己中了马蹄铁的诅咒；在琳琅满目的水晶吊灯和杯子反射的柔和光晕里，她屏息地迎向他紧张的面容，怦然心动
那不是戏剧，是他们在演自己，在向世界宣布他们那时还很纯洁的爱情，通过柔情蜜意的光和影
他对着她微笑，牙齿像月光下细小的贝壳，洁白晶莹灿亮；她对着他生气，眼神像阳光下北极的冰山，暖化雪冷幽蓝
无论他们后来如何，这是一部好影片
只是，在我笑容满面地留恋观看他们的佳片时，清楚地意识到：我那被摒弃到神经末梢的第八敏感，兀自泪流满面
不知道有多少人事变迁，不知道有多少沧海桑田，不知道有多少分分合合，不知道有多少愁肠百转
是他们的分崩离析，也是每个人的聚合分离；电影的圆满永远停顿在执子之手的温馨时分，我们的故事早已湮没进雨雪霏霏的白驹过隙
相聚何曾恨离别，情到深处亦淡泊。本来都是你侬我侬，最后却你是你、我是我，谁——也不是谁的
他那时真帅，无论多么狼狈或站在她身旁显得多么矮；她那时真美，金红色的柔细卷发在白玉般的脸颊旁缠绕成一圈一圈，真正当得那句鬓云欲度香腮雪。他还不像执导那样朗笑世故，她还不像影后那样娇笑适度；他看她都是真正深情款款的神色，她看他都是真正眷恋依依的胶着；他在含笑和奔跑时都有勒斯达的影子，她在高傲和矜持时都有红磨坊的美姿；他情感的收敛渲泻欲盖弥彰，她情感的热烈喷薄灼灼煌煌——彼此当年少，莫负好时光
俄克拉荷马的土地上繁衍生息着丹诺利一家，他们喜欢把一首缠绵的小调哼唱：“她美丽的眼睛是可怕的咒语……”泥土是他们永远的根，无关现实中那对爱侣是怎样地黯然拆分
时隔多年后无意中重温佳作，竟唏嘘似复见爱人沉默垂泪的拜伦；如若早知今日需在另外的男女身上找到幸福，当初何必野心勃勃地实现伉俪档的大地雄心？
电影精彩无比，难抑伤心泪滴
此情可待成追忆，也难绾系也难羁
日前，电影频道忽然播出了《大地雄心》，转台晚了，只看到一个结尾，却是最激动人心的部分。重温着最年轻英俊的农民约瑟夫，重温着最狂野执著的淑女莎朗……那是十六年前的汤哥和妮姐，那是他们延续金童玉女神话的时刻，那是相爱的季节，饱含相思的脉脉
如今琵琶别抱蝉过别枝，梧桐落籽水仙结实，再看当年影片，伤感和遗憾怎能不使人念及春江月夜桥边红药，对影徘徊孤独寂寥？
原是我最爱的靓汤冷妮夫妻档电影，《大开眼戒》根本不及它边角。当年电影上映恶评如潮，我却独爱约瑟夫的鲁莽率性和莎朗的发鬈飘摇
终究是劳燕分飞了。他没有壮志凌云，只是专心育女；她站在奥斯卡和香奈儿的红地毯顶端，却莞尔一笑暗洒泪滴。两人可还记得，曾在同一部电影中青涩配戏、驰骋大地？
Far And Away——《大地雄心》译名粗犷，《遥远的地平线》译名细腻，如今看来总是悲凄。甚至连主人公的名字也有玄机：农民约瑟夫搏到了土地赢得了娇妻，而国王约瑟夫最终却失去了茜茜。可恼他们夫妻，在相亲相爱了十年后，决绝仳离
他们肯定忘却了那个画面：在一望无际的土地上，他远远地凝视着她穿梭的背影，感到自己中了马蹄铁的诅咒；在琳琅满目的水晶吊灯和杯子反射的柔和光晕里，她屏息地迎向他紧张的面容，怦然心动
那不是戏剧，是他们在演自己，在向世界宣布他们那时还很纯洁的爱情，通过柔情蜜意的光和影
他对着她微笑，牙齿像月光下细小的贝壳，洁白晶莹灿亮；她对着他生气，眼神像阳光下北极的冰山，暖化雪冷幽蓝
无论他们后来如何，这是一部好影片
只是，在我笑容满面地留恋观看他们的佳片时，清楚地意识到：我那被摒弃到神经末梢的第八敏感，兀自泪流满面
不知道有多少人事变迁，不知道有多少沧海桑田，不知道有多少分分合合，不知道有多少愁肠百转
是他们的分崩离析，也是每个人的聚合分离；电影的圆满永远停顿在执子之手的温馨时分，我们的故事早已湮没进雨雪霏霏的白驹过隙
相聚何曾恨离别，情到深处亦淡泊。本来都是你侬我侬，最后却你是你、我是我，谁——也不是谁的
他那时真帅，无论多么狼狈或站在她身旁显得多么矮；她那时真美，金红色的柔细卷发在白玉般的脸颊旁缠绕成一圈一圈，真正当得那句鬓云欲度香腮雪。他还不像执导那样朗笑世故，她还不像影后那样娇笑适度；他看她都是真正深情款款的神色，她看他都是真正眷恋依依的胶着；他在含笑和奔跑时都有勒斯达的影子，她在高傲和矜持时都有红磨坊的美姿；他情感的收敛渲泻欲盖弥彰，她情感的热烈喷薄灼灼煌煌——彼此当年少，莫负好时光
俄克拉荷马的土地上繁衍生息着丹诺利一家，他们喜欢把一首缠绵的小调哼唱：“她美丽的眼睛是可怕的咒语……”泥土是他们永远的根，无关现实中那对爱侣是怎样地黯然拆分
时隔多年后无意中重温佳作，竟唏嘘似复见爱人沉默垂泪的拜伦；如若早知今日需在另外的男女身上找到幸福，当初何必野心勃勃地实现伉俪档的大地雄心？
电影精彩无比，难抑伤心泪滴
此情可待成追忆，也难绾系也难羁
Shannon: "Joseph, Am I beautiful at all?"Joseph: "I've never seen anything like you in all my living life."
有人说是他俩夫妻档最好的片子，可是什么叫好呢，他们现在已经各有各家～真的令人唏嘘～电影的魔力大概可见一斑了～
也许片名翻译成“携手闯天涯”之类的更能体现出这是一部爱情片，或者翻译成“梦在远方”之类的更能体现出这是一部文艺片，只是片尾的剧情大逆转终于把这部作品定性为励志片……片尾出现了恩雅的音乐，对我是个安慰
有地主与佃农，有阶级对立，有富家小姐与穷小子，有漂洋过海，有相依为命，有少男少女的小心思，有拳王争霸，有小鲜肉汤姆裤拉丝，有穷困潦倒，有枪战与手搏，以及关于土地的故事，这样一个好故事，要是再拍得不好看，那真是见鬼了！
挺喜欢这部电影的，想想那时候骑骑马就能有一块那么大的一块地，哪像现在为了几十平米拼死拼活。汤姆克鲁斯的夫妻档电影现在看还是感到惋惜啊!
资料馆2015.1.23.7pm 给共和党看的主流电影（性别意识、阶级立场上都非常保守陈旧），核心家庭与移民建国神话。开头的风光、圈地竞赛的展示，和总体摄影都还不错。但剧本实在是问题太多，如果把波士顿戏砍一半、音乐节制些使用，会好一些。每一场景的拍法太好猜（最后摇上去又下来真是要笑出来）。
they needed a country that was big enough for both of their dreams````
阿汤和妮可这对曾经的夫妻档在这部里的合作也就比矫揉造作无病呻吟格调腐朽的《大开眼戒》强了至少十倍吧，美丽的金发姑娘妮可和毛头小子阿汤，俩都是野草一样倔强而又奔放的生命，最适合生活在拓荒时期广袤、蕴含着无限机会的美国大西部，而非新旧转折阶级冲突剧烈的老爱尔兰。喜欢这种勇敢泼辣叛逆强韧的女性主角塑造，女主的父母也挺可爱的。
曾经的恩爱情侣阿汤与尼克如今早已劳燕分飞，但当年青春热血的他们，为了自由平等的美国梦，为了俄克拉荷马州广袤的草原上的万马奔腾，付出了多少鲜血汗水努力。大地雄心，大地恩情，荡气回肠。
美国梦，简直就是杰克和肉丝到达美国后的续集。多甜蜜的两个人，那时他们都还年轻，都是粉红色的。两人互窥好逗。
粗暴直接生猛，性欲与暴力，本身倒是统一得很。开头一段很有短篇小说里爱尔兰乡野的神秘跳脱谐趣感，可惜这个美国梦太钱权，土地没有得到更多的重视和抒发。波士顿大宅的蓝光之吻太美，是足以留名的一段。
【中国电影资料馆展映】朗·霍华德执导，阿汤哥和妮可基德曼如胶似漆恋爱的时候演的片子。（只看过他俩要离婚的时候拍的《大开眼戒》……银幕内外真是同步）典型的屌丝配富家女共同实现美国梦的爱情片。剧情套路化，打拳的场面特别假。对手几乎是站着让阿汤哥打。但宏大壮观的场面和摄影非常棒，震撼
史诗片，开头好看，中间略闷，结尾开阔。19世纪末爱尔兰佃户和逃家大小姐共闯美国的曲折冒险经历。有文学作品式的细腻感，朗•霍华德沉得住气。爱尔兰佃户命大，拳击打那么猛，还活蹦乱跳的。白担心他会死于脾脏破裂内出血了。结尾时这位佃户帅得有点过分，谁干的好事？把他脸擦得干干净净，卷毛也往后梳顺了。这还怎么看剧情！
应该是引进公映过上海电影译制厂译制 翻译：倪蔚佳译制导演：狄菲菲配音演员：吴磊、冯骏骅、王肖兵、程玉珠(2022-2-9国配版大屏再看一遍)
因为一直都不算太喜欢妮可和汤姆克鲁斯，所以没怎么在意过这部他俩的早期作品，居然相当不错。那个时候的妮可还略略有点婴儿肥，喜欢汤姆克鲁斯扮演的约瑟，年轻热情冲动，意气奋发，勇敢鲁莽，怀着梦想和勇气。一路跌倒爬起，再跌倒再爬起。
阿汤哥90年代资源太好了，演了太多经典好片，当然那个时候人也是好的不行，不愧于当时的第一当红小生。看这部再想想后来发生的事情，真的是眼泪都要掉下来。
阿汤的农民本色!原来爱尔兰方言里答话用的是“嗳”....妮可一如既往的美。
史诗般的爱情记录，就是Tom Cruise和Nicole Kidman的身高不是那么和谐，当时他们还是夫妻么
以前看过一点，今天补完，故事比较俗套，农民小伙奋斗史，最后抱得美人归。当年的克鲁斯和基德曼都是如此的年轻，可惜最后还是劳燕分飞了……赛马抢地的那段很壮观
不同于四五十年代《布鲁克林》的暗潮汹涌，朗·霍华德这部19世纪初的《大地雄心 Far and Away (1992)》算是一拳一拳地打在了爱尔兰人的身上。汤姆·克鲁斯和妮可·基德曼继《霹雳男儿》之后再谱恋曲，人们对土地和家园的执着从来就没有改变过，片中万马奔腾的场面让人难忘，可惜当年票房并不是很理想。